FammetaX Sport
Expose hubBets to TakeLong Shot TicketsResultsThe mathParlaysLimitsFines & promosNBA props

Win and get limited

The books sell “anyone can win.” Then they cap the ones who do. This isn’t a forum rumor anymore — Massachusetts made the books hand over their data.

What the Massachusetts Gaming Commission found

The MGC sent licensed Massachusetts sportsbooks a formal information request demanding each player’s “stake factor” (betting limit) and closing-line value. The conclusion, in the Commission’s own memo [src]:

“…players who consistently beat the closing line are more likely to have a lower stake factor (i.e., have their limit lowered) and players who do not consistently beat the closing line are more likely to have a higher stake factor (i.e., have their limit raised). In addition, individuals whose limits have been raised are far more likely to be classified as VIPs while very few limited players had VIP status.”
“…whether there is a trend showing that players who demonstrate a tendency to win have their limit decreased and players who demonstrate a tendency to lose have their limit increased. The data received from operators confirms that the answer to that question is yes.”
0.64%of Massachusetts accounts limited as of Dec 10, 2024 [src]
12.7%of limited players capped below 1% of the default limit
57.6%capped at 1–24% of the default
3.4%only lightly limited (75–99%)

Translation: winners get choked to pennies; losers get raised limits and a VIP host.

They wouldn’t show up

The Wall Street Journal reported (July 13, 2024, “Sports Betting Companies Weed Out Winners. Gamblers Want to Know Why.”) that DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, ESPN Bet and Fanatics had agreed to attend a Massachusetts session on limits — and then didn’t show. The article is reprinted in the MGC’s public meeting packet. [src]

Now they have to tell you

Massachusetts adopted 205 CMR 238.30(11): operators must have “procedures to provide timely notice to a patron that their wagering activity has been limited, including a specific explanation for the attachment of the limit(s) and identification as to which market(s) are so limited.” [src] It took effect June 1, 2026, with a 48-hour notice window, and covers people already limited. [src] Massachusetts is the first state to require it. Ask your legislator why yours doesn’t.

What to do

Sources

  1. Massachusetts Gaming Commission, meeting packet 9/30/2025: “Player Limiting Data Analysis Results”
  2. MGC meeting packet 9/11/2024 (reprints WSJ, “Sports Betting Companies Weed Out Winners. Gamblers Want to Know Why.”, July 13, 2024)
  3. 205 CMR 238.30(11), Mass. Register #1572 (04/24/2026)
  4. CBS Sports: Massachusetts first state to require sportsbooks to explain limits